lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:59:11 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	dhillf@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	hannes@...xchg.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V8 14/16] hugetlb/cgroup: add charge/uncharge calls for HugeTLB alloc/free

Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> writes:

> On Sat 09-06-12 14:29:59, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> 
>> This adds necessary charge/uncharge calls in the HugeTLB code.  We do
>> hugetlb cgroup charge in page alloc and uncharge in compound page destructor.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/hugetlb.c        |   16 +++++++++++++++-
>>  mm/hugetlb_cgroup.c |    7 +------
>>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> index bf79131..4ca92a9 100644
>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>> @@ -628,6 +628,8 @@ static void free_huge_page(struct page *page)
>>  	BUG_ON(page_mapcount(page));
>>  
>>  	spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>> +	hugetlb_cgroup_uncharge_page(hstate_index(h),
>> +				     pages_per_huge_page(h), page);
>>  	if (h->surplus_huge_pages_node[nid] && huge_page_order(h) < MAX_ORDER) {
>>  		/* remove the page from active list */
>>  		list_del(&page->lru);
>> @@ -1116,7 +1118,10 @@ static struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>  	struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
>>  	struct page *page;
>>  	long chg;
>> +	int ret, idx;
>> +	struct hugetlb_cgroup *h_cg;
>>  
>> +	idx = hstate_index(h);
>>  	/*
>>  	 * Processes that did not create the mapping will have no
>>  	 * reserves and will not have accounted against subpool
>> @@ -1132,6 +1137,11 @@ static struct page *alloc_huge_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>  		if (hugepage_subpool_get_pages(spool, chg))
>>  			return ERR_PTR(-ENOSPC);
>>  
>> +	ret = hugetlb_cgroup_charge_page(idx, pages_per_huge_page(h), &h_cg);
>
> So we do not have any page yet and hugetlb_cgroup_charge_cgroup sound
> more appropriate
>

Will do

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ