[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120611114239.GL11439@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:42:40 +0800
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Bengt Jonsson <bengt.g.jonsson@...ricsson.com>,
Mattias WALLIN <mattias.wallin@...ricsson.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/22] regulator: Change ab8500 match names to reflect
Device Tree
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:28:57PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 11/06/12 11:36, Mark Brown wrote:
> >Suppose you have two devices of the same type with an array of name
> >based regulators, meaning the nodes with constraints have to have a
> >particular name in order to be matched to the regulator. How would a
> >consumer reference a node to specify a supply?
> some-regulators {
> compatible = "protect_me_from_similarly_named_regulators";
>
> regulator_node_name_reg: regulator_node_name {
> <blah>
> };
> };
> [supply_name]-supply = <®ulator_node_name>;
I'm not 100% sure you read what I wrote above or in all the previous
mails about having two devices of the same type? The case where we have
only one regulator of a given type obviously works otherwise people
would have noticed, the problem starts when you have two of the same
regulator device down.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists