linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/22] regulator: Change db8500-prcmu match names to reflect Device Tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 20:08:27 +0800
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, arnd@...db.de,
	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, grant.likely@...retlab.ca,
	cjb@...top.org, sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/22] regulator: Change db8500-prcmu match names to
 reflect Device Tree

On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:21:00PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 05/06/12 11:42, Mark Brown wrote:
> >On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:34:12AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:

> >>Well without it all regulator requests from DT will fail.

> >Oh, ffs.  Why wasn't this mentioned when the patch was posted,

> I did. My 00 patch mentioned that these were all clean-ups/bug fixes
> destined for the for RCs.

You didn't CC me on that as far as I can tell so I never saw it, and
even if you had it's rather burying the lead with a large series of what
mostly looks like random cleanups from the bits I see in my archive.  I
think I assumed another patch in the series changed the names in the
device tree or added the device tree.

> Nevertheless, these two patches are required for a decent boot.

Fail.  Well, I guess I'll end up dulplicating the commits :/

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)