linux-kernel - Re: [BUGFIX] ACPI, APEI, Avoid too much error reporting in runtime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:25:27 +0100
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
Cc:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX] ACPI, APEI, Avoid too much error reporting in runtime

On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 14:23 +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> This patch fixed the following bug.
> 
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43282
> 
> This is caused by a firmware bug checking (checking generic address
> register provided by firmware) in runtime.  The checking should be
> done in address mapping time instead of runtime to avoid too much
> error reporting in runtime.
> 
> Reported-by: Pawel Sikora <pluto@...k.net>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> Tested-by: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
[...]

This is not the correct way to submit a patch for stable.  See
Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Computers are not intelligent.	They only think they are.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)