[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120611165413.GC2521@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 09:54:13 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...ell.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: rcu: endless stalls
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 04:22:23PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 06:39 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:06:16PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I received a report of a 48 core UV box hitting a gripe, taking longer
> > > than timeout to emit same, so box griped endlessly, forcing reboot.
> >
> > So it took minutes to print an RCU CPU stall warning? On only 48 CPUs?
> >
> > If so, yow!!!
>
> The report was a tad fuzzy on details, but serial console can take a
> while at low baud rate, and the box was apparently perma-stalled.
Which clearly demands the question "why not increase the serial-console
baud rate"... ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> > My guess is that rcu_cpu_stall_suppress must be manipulated atomically
> > for this to work reliably, for example, using xchg().
>
> Ah, thanks.
>
> -Mike
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists