linux-kernel - [patch v3] sched: fix select_idle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1339433835.7358.30.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2012 18:57:15 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Arjan Van De Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [patch v3] sched: fix select_idle_sibling() induced bouncing

v2->v3 delta:
1. Drop superfluous barriers.  So maybe we do a fallback rq selection in
a very rare case, who cares.  If it matters, lock it.

2. Put idle_buddy cpus_allowed check that went missing back. 


Traversing an entire package is not only expensive, it also leads to tasks
bouncing all over a partially idle and possible quite large package.  Fix
that up by assigning a 'buddy' CPU to try to motivate.  Each buddy may try
to motivate that one other CPU, if it's busy, tough, it may then try it's
SMT sibling, but that's all this optimization is allowed to cost.

Sibling cache buddies are cross-wired to prevent bouncing.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>

---
 include/linux/sched.h |    1 +
 kernel/sched/core.c   |   34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 kernel/sched/fair.c   |   28 +++++++---------------------
 3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -955,6 +955,7 @@ struct sched_domain {
 	unsigned int smt_gain;
 	int flags;			/* See SD_* */
 	int level;
+	int idle_buddy;			/* cpu assigned to select_idle_sibling() */
 
 	/* Runtime fields. */
 	unsigned long last_balance;	/* init to jiffies. units in jiffies */
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5928,6 +5928,11 @@ static void destroy_sched_domains(struct
  * SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCE set (Last Level Cache Domain) for this
  * allows us to avoid some pointer chasing select_idle_sibling().
  *
+ * Iterate domains and sched_groups upward, assigning CPUs to be
+ * select_idle_sibling() hw buddy.  Cross-wiring hw makes bouncing
+ * due to random perturbation self canceling, ie sw buddies pull
+ * their counterpart to their CPU's hw counterpart.
+ *
  * Also keep a unique ID per domain (we use the first cpu number in
  * the cpumask of the domain), this allows us to quickly tell if
  * two cpus are in the same cache domain, see cpus_share_cache().
@@ -5943,8 +5948,35 @@ static void update_domain_cache(int cpu)
 	int id = cpu;
 
 	sd = highest_flag_domain(cpu, SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES);
-	if (sd)
+	if (sd) {
+		struct sched_domain *tmp = sd;
+		struct sched_group *sg, *prev;
+		bool right;
+
+		do {
+			id = cpumask_first(sched_domain_span(tmp));
+			prev = sg = tmp->groups;
+			right = 1;
+
+			while (cpumask_first(sched_group_cpus(sg)) != id)
+				sg = sg->next;
+
+			while (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_group_cpus(sg))) {
+				prev = sg;
+				sg = sg->next;
+				right = !right;
+			}
+
+			/* A CPU went down, never point back to domain start. */
+			if (right && cpumask_first(sched_group_cpus(sg->next)) == id)
+				right = false;
+
+			sg = right? sg->next : prev;
+			tmp->idle_buddy = cpumask_first(sched_group_cpus(sg));
+		} while ((tmp = tmp->child));
+
 		id = cpumask_first(sched_domain_span(sd));
+	}
 
 	rcu_assign_pointer(per_cpu(sd_llc, cpu), sd);
 	per_cpu(sd_llc_id, cpu) = id;
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2642,8 +2642,6 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct ta
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	int prev_cpu = task_cpu(p);
 	struct sched_domain *sd;
-	struct sched_group *sg;
-	int i;
 
 	/*
 	 * If the task is going to be woken-up on this cpu and if it is
@@ -2660,29 +2658,17 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct ta
 		return prev_cpu;
 
 	/*
-	 * Otherwise, iterate the domains and find an elegible idle cpu.
+	 * Otherwise, check assigned siblings to find an elegible idle cpu.
 	 */
 	sd = rcu_dereference(per_cpu(sd_llc, target));
+
 	for_each_lower_domain(sd) {
-		sg = sd->groups;
-		do {
-			if (!cpumask_intersects(sched_group_cpus(sg),
-						tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
-				goto next;
-
-			for_each_cpu(i, sched_group_cpus(sg)) {
-				if (!idle_cpu(i))
-					goto next;
-			}
-
-			target = cpumask_first_and(sched_group_cpus(sg),
-					tsk_cpus_allowed(p));
-			goto done;
-next:
-			sg = sg->next;
-		} while (sg != sd->groups);
+		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(sd->idle_buddy, tsk_cpus_allowed(p)))
+			continue;
+		if (idle_cpu(sd->idle_buddy))
+			return sd->idle_buddy;
 	}
-done:
+
 	return target;
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/