linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] i2c: tegra: Bug fixes, cleanups and M

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120612085040.GC9230@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 10:50:40 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	"khali@...ux-fr.org" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	"ben-linux@...ff.org" <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] i2c: tegra: Bug fixes, cleanups and M_NOSTART support

On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 10:37:36PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Tuesday 05 June 2012 09:44 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >On 06/05/2012 07:09 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> >>This patch series having the:
> >>- Handling of late register write due to Tegra PPSB design.
> >>- support for I2C_M_NOSTART
> >>- Use devm_* for all allocation.
> >The series,
> >
> >Acked-by: Stephen Warren<swarren@...dotorg.org>
> >
> >Note that patch 4 touches context adjacent to Prashant's "i2c: tegra:
> >Add clk_prepare/clk_unprepare" patch, which I hope to take through the
> >Tegra tree since it's a requirement for the Tegra common clock
> >conversion. I don't think this will cause any significant conflict, but
> >perhaps it's worth resolving it explicitly.

Is it really a requirement? Just wondering if it will cause problems, if
Prashant's patch goes in via I2C after arm-soc has been merged. I am
fine with simply acking the patch, though.

> >Wolfram, perhaps we should put these 4 patches and Prashan'ts into their
> >own topic branch so that you can merge it into the I2C tree, and I can
> >merge it into the Tegra tree too? Or, I can take everything through
> >Tegra if you want, and ack it.

Laxman's patches should really go via I2C, I think. Can't we just fix
the conflict in arm-soc?

Regards,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)