[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1339496803-2885-1-git-send-email-liwp.linux@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 18:26:43 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>
To: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@...il.com>,
Wanpeng Li <liswp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] writeback: avoid race when update bandwidth
From: Wanpeng Li <liwp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Since bdi->wb.list_lock is used to protect the b_* lists,
so the flushers who call wb_writeback to writeback pages will
stuck when bandwidth update policy holds this lock. In order
to avoid this race we can introduce a new bandwidth_lock who
is responsible for protecting bandwidth update policy.
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liswp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index c8945e0..b3b08fb 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -1032,12 +1032,14 @@ static void bdi_update_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
unsigned long bdi_dirty,
unsigned long start_time)
{
+ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bandwidth_lock);
+
if (time_is_after_eq_jiffies(bdi->bw_time_stamp + BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL))
return;
- spin_lock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
+ spin_lock(&bandwidth_lock);
__bdi_update_bandwidth(bdi, thresh, bg_thresh, dirty,
bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty, start_time);
- spin_unlock(&bdi->wb.list_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&bandwidth_lock);
}
/*
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists