[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANaxB-xZ+KDZGMb8G1s5q+R_jzdWbP_FFxiGR=s4L90_tUqNjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 17:15:32 +0400
From: Andrew Wagin <avagin@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>, Oleg Strikov <OSTRIKOV@...dia.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 0/5] Teach perf tool to profile sleep times (V4)
Hello,
> So I really don't like this stuff either.. :-)
>
> Mostly because it adds very similar stuff to what's already there and
> then doesn't try and consolidate things.
>
> And partly because you're measuring the 'wrong' thing, the delay between
> sched-out and sched-in includes a number of things, only one part of
> that is the delay due to blocking.
>
> And as a result you need that hideous prev_state crap.
>
Yes, you are right.
>
>
> Would something like the below work?
Yes, I like it. Are you going to commit this? Thank for this work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists