linux-kernel - Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd: [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver. 0.1.0)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1339512147.2099.3.camel@sysadmin.euractiv.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:42:27 +0200
From:	Jimmy Thrasibule <thrasibule.jimmy@...il.com>
To:	Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What is the right practice to get new code upstream( was Fwd:
 [patch] a simple hardware detector for latency as well as throughput ver.
 0.1.0)

On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 20:57 +0800, Luming Yu wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I must have forgotten cc key persons. Sorry to make noise again.
> I need to know what the right practice is to get your attention to
> accept a new tool upstream like this one.
Might good to have a look at the following:

http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
http://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/SubmitChecklist
http://www.linuxfoundation.org/content/how-participate-linux-community

Regards,
Jimmy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/