[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120612180709.GA9775@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:07:09 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ben Chan <benchan@...omium.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sage Ahn <syahn@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: gdm72xx: Fix spinlock recursion on
gdm_usb_send_complete
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:40:52AM -0700, Ben Chan wrote:
> This patch fixes a spinlock recursion bug on several call sites of
> gdm_usb_send_complete by not calling spin_lock_irqsave on
> urb->context->tx_cxt->lock when the lock has already been acquired.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Chan <benchan@...omium.org>
> Cc: Sage Ahn <syahn@...semi.com>
> ---
> This revised patch simplifies the previous patch.
Argh, I _just_ applied the previous patch :(
Care to send me an incremental one, fixing it up to look like this now
so I don't have to revert your previous one?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists