[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120612190449.GH19410@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 12:04:49 -0700
From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: cache parent clocks only for muxes
On 20120606-11:47, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 02:41:30PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> > caching parent clocks makes sense only when a clock has more
> > than one parent (mux clocks).
> > Avoid doing this for every other clock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/clk.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > index 687b00d..40568e9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -1229,7 +1229,7 @@ int __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk *clk)
> > * If clk->parents is not NULL we skip this entire block. This allows
> > * for clock drivers to statically initialize clk->parents.
> > */
> > - if (clk->num_parents && !clk->parents) {
> > + if ((clk->num_parents > 1) && !clk->parents) {
>
> You don't need the additional parens here. Please learn the C precedence
> rules. Additional unnecessary parens can make expressions much harder
> to read.
Rajendra,
I've taken this patch into clk-next for testing. I've fixed up the
extra parens locally, so no need for a resend.
Regards,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists