lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 23:09:47 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Wallak <wallak@...e.fr>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: File copy is very slow on linux-3.4.2 (or linux-3.3x) on a
 specific hardware: AMD FX-8150 + 990FX

On Tue 12-06-12 20:39:32, Wallak wrote:
> Jan Kara wrote:
> >On Mon 11-06-12 21:54:16, wallak@...e.fr wrote:
> >>I've a very annoying issue on recent kernel (linux-3.4.2-SMP) with my main motherboard (AMD FX-8150 + 990FX - 8 cores 4.1GHz), file copy is very slow (see below). The same kernel works flawlessly on an AMD E450 2 cores motherboard.
> >>
> >>Linux-3.2.20 works properly on this hardware.
> >>hdparm -t gives good results on both kernels.
> >>
> >>I've no idea where this bug come from. Do you have this issue on your hardware ? A patch is available ?
> >>
> >>
> >>*linux-3.4.2
> >>dd if=../in/file_8gb.tmp of=tmp.tmp bs=1024k count=100
> >>100+0 records in
> >>100+0 records out
> >>104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 132.884 s, 789 kB/s
> >>
> >>
> >>*linux-3.2.20
> >>dd if=../in/file_8gb.tmp of=tmp.tmp bs=1024k count=100
> >>100+0 records in
> >>100+0 records out
> >>104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 3.30793 s, 31.7 MB/s
> >   So let's separate reading and writing part first. What is the speed of
> >dd if=../in/file_8gb.tmp of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
> >   on both kernels?
> >And what is the speed of:
> >dd if=/dev/zero of=tmp.tm bs=1M count=100
> 
> You're right, the issue is only while writing. The results are below:
> 
> #linux-3.4.2
> dd if=/dev/zero of=tmp.tm bs=1M count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 151.347 s, 693 kB/s
> dd if=../in/file_8gb.tmp of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 1.26228 s, 83.1 MB/s
> 
> #linux-3.2.20
> dd if=/dev/zero of=tmp.tm bs=1M count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 1.00838 s, 104 MB/s
> dd if=../in/file_8gb.tmp of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes (105 MB) copied, 1.26947 s, 82.6 MB/s
> 
> 
> >
> >   Also what filesystems are you using?
> 
> This is an ext2 file system:
> 
> /dev/sda6      ext2    464463364 323380956 141082408  70% /backup
  OK, I'm surprised by one thing - how come the writes do no end up cached
in memory (thus you should get much higher throughput). Is the filesystem
mounted with -o sync option by any chance?

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ