[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120612230218.GD1973@amt.cnet>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 20:02:18 -0300
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, avi@...hat.com,
raghukt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, jeremy@...p.org,
vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] KVM: Add paravirt kvm_flush_tlb_others
On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:37:24AM +0530, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> flush_tlb_others_ipi depends on lot of statics in tlb.c. Replicated
> the flush_tlb_others_ipi as kvm_flush_tlb_others to further adapt to
> paravirtualization.
>
> Use the vcpu state information inside the kvm_flush_tlb_others to
> avoid sending ipi to pre-empted vcpus.
>
> * Do not send ipi's to offline vcpus and set flush_on_enter flag
> * For online vcpus: Wait for them to clear the flag
>
> The approach was discussed here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/20/157
>
> Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A. Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Why not reintroduce the hypercall to flush TLBs? No waiting, no
entry/exit trickery.
This is half-way-there paravirt with all the downsides. Even though the
guest running information might be useful in other cases.
> Pseudo Algo:
>
> Write()
> ======
>
> guest_exit()
> flush_on_enter[i]=0;
> running[i] = 0;
>
> guest_enter()
> running[i] = 1;
> smp_mb();
> if(flush_on_enter[i]) {
> tlb_flush()
> flush_on_enter[i]=0;
> }
>
>
> Read()
> ======
>
> GUEST KVM-HV
>
> f->flushcpumask = cpumask - me;
>
> again:
> for_each_cpu(i, f->flushmask) {
>
> if (!running[i]) {
> case 1:
>
> running[n]=1
>
> (cpuN does not see
> flush_on_enter set,
> guest later finds it
> running and sends ipi,
> we are fine here, need
> to clear the flag on
> guest_exit)
>
> flush_on_enter[i] = 1;
> case2:
>
> running[n]=1
> (cpuN - will see flush
> on enter and an IPI as
> well - addressed in patch-4)
>
> if (!running[i])
> cpu_clear(f->flushmask); All is well, vm_enter
> will do the fixup
> }
> case 3:
> running[n] = 0;
>
> (cpuN went to sleep,
> we saw it as awake,
> ipi sent, but wait
> will break without
> zero_mask and goto
> again will take care)
>
> }
> send_ipi(f->flushmask)
>
> wait_a_while_for_zero_mask();
>
> if (!zero_mask)
> goto again;
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_para.h | 3 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 9 ++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 14 ++++++++-
> arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists