linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] driver core: fixup reversed deferred probe order

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120612231705.GB6177@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:17:05 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, Rafael <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Magnus <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Linux-SH <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: fixup reversed deferred probe order

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 06:46:06PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> If driver requests probe deferral,
> it will be added to deferred_probe_pending_list
> by driver_deferred_probe_add(), but, it used list_add().
> Because of that, deferred probe will be run as reversed order.
> This patch uses list_add_tail(), and solved this issue.

Is this causing a problem with 3.5-rc2 on some systems, so it needs to
get into 3.5-final, or can it wait for 3.6?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/