[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120613073846.GA8057@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:38:46 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
mingo@...e.hu, jolsa@...hat.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/13] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support
* Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Peter suggests keeping the uncore names as they're listed in
> > the intel doc. For Sandybirdge-EP, uncore names are
> > something like: Cbo, iMC, QPI. I think Uncore_Cbo_0 appears
> > better than uncore_Cbo_0
>
> Keeping the name is different from keeping the upper vs. lower
> case letters. I think this need to be case insensitive. What
> does it buy you to be case sensitive? Don't think Intel is
> ever going to create two events which differ only by the lower
> vs. upper case. And, I think that's extra frustration when you
> type the event name because you have to also remember the
> letter case.
Yeah - the right approach is to make it all lowercase in sysfs -
then user-space can tolower() the string provided by the user.
There should be no case sensitivity in event specifications
anywhere.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists