[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF1ivSYBjw+UP3vP8RHaftjR8NJZEaHA1rtJ5ujDjkj-djHLTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 16:03:23 +0800
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@....com>, Holger Macht <holger@...ac.de>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] libata: bind the Linux device tree to the ACPI
device tree
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>> +static int is_pci_ata(struct device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct pci_dev *pdev;
>> +
>> + if (!is_pci_dev(dev))
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
>> +
>> + if ((pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_SATA &&
>> + (pdev->class >> 8) != PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE)
>> + return 0;
>
> This needs a better name. It doesn't check if a device is PCI ATA or
> anything of the sort, it checks if its probably a device in compatibility
> mode. A lot of controllers will in fact report RAID class or similar in
> native mode.
How about compat_pci_ata?
>
> Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists