[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120613092703.GA4701@cucamonga.audible.transient.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:27:03 +0000
From: Jamie Heilman <jamie@...ible.transient.net>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RPC: fragment too large with transition to 3.4
Jamie Heilman wrote:
> It's looking like my issues with "RPC: fragment too large" may be
> something else entirely at this point, I've noticed other weird
> network behavior that I'm gonna have to try to isolate before I keep
> blaming nfs changes. Though for some reason my
> /proc/fs/nfsd/max_block_size ends up only 128KiB w/3.4 where it was
> 512KiB w/3.3.
OK, I get it now. 32-bit PAE system w/4G of RAM (minus a chunk for
the IGP video etc.) for my NFS server, and the max_block_size
calculation changed significantly in commit
508f92275624fc755104b17945bdc822936f1918 to account for rpc buffers
only being in low memory. That means whereas in 3.3 the math came out
to having a target size of roughly 843241 my new target size in 3.4 is
only 219959-ish, so choosing 128KiB is understandable. The problem
was that all my clients had negotiated their nfs mounts against the
v3.3 value of 512KiB, and when I rebooted into 3.4... they hit the
wall attempting larger transfers and become uselessly stuck at that
point. If I remount everything before doing any large transfers, then
it negotiates a lower wsize and things work fine. So everything is
working as planned I suppose... the transition between 3.3 and 3.4 is
just a bit rough.
--
Jamie Heilman http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists