[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANKRQngP3e3U+VZDgA7fQfxBti9vri-AEAR8iTmhLYiqXP_kiw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:41:57 +0900
From: Tomoya MORINAGA <tomoya.rohm@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, lars@...afoo.de,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v5] sound/soc/lapis: add platform driver for ML7213
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> There are some drivers that predate the availibility of the dmaengine
> framework.
In case, you develop a new ASoC framework, all previous ASoC drivers
should be adopted to the framework by yourself, don't you ?
Because a new developer must be confused by this.
> This, and the fact that the PCH driver uses dmaengine without using any
> shared code, is the topic of the discussion. It is entirely natural
> that there are no open coded drivers using cyclic DMA via dmaengine,
> they have all had that code factored out.
>
> Please stop this and at least look at factoring this code out. If it
> turns out that there's some reason why it's a lot of work that's one
> thing but it seems clear that you've not even looked yet. It's like the
> previous issues where you were sending patches which would clearly not
> run successfully, it's not a very positive approach.
OK, I'll stop this.
I wanted to finish adding these patch series to upstream because we
spent much resource on this.
But I'm involved in other work, so I can't start now.
Until now thank you for your support.
Regards.
--
ROHM Co., Ltd.
tomoya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists