linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] NFS: hard-code init_net for NFS callback transports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2012 07:15:35 -0400
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
Cc:	"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Trond.Myklebust@...app.com" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...nvz.org" <devel@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: hard-code init_net for NFS callback transports

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:16:07PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> 12.06.2012 19:53, J. Bruce Fields написал:
> >On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 08:37:18AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 01:55:47PM +0400, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> >>>This patch set is a bug fix for Bruce's 3.5 branch.
> >>>I'll rebase this for 3.4 and resend.
> >>
> >>Apologies for neglecting this, I'm done with the bakeathon and should be
> >>back to this soon.
> >>
> >>But, I'm a bit confused: you say you'll rebase this, but I've only seen
> >>two rebased patches for 3.4, and neither looks like a simple rebase of
> >>this one.
> >
> >Oh, I see; the backport of "SUNRPC: new svc_bind() routine introduced"
> >is a combination of the patch by the same name upstream with this one.
> >
> >In future for backports I'd rather keep a one-to-one correspondance
> >between the original patches and the backported patches.  (Even if that
> >means 4.2 might not be as "bisectable".)
> >
> >Also, get this patch into stable by just adding a "cc:
> >stable@...r.kernel.org" with the signed-off at the end of this patch.
> >
> >I've gone ahead and fixed that up; results in the "for-3.4" and
> >"for-3.5" branches of
> >
> >	git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux-topics.git
> >
> >Let me know if anything looks wrong.
> >
> 
> 
> Hi, Bruce. Thanks for you time and guidance with this patch set.
> But I'm a bit confused - what I have to do now? Take the patches
> from your 3.4 branch and send them to "stable"?

No, I'll take care of them.--b.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/