linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] perf: perf_output

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABPqkBTM7xcy_BdB2cHL4cvbk0wihB1PonC4nZCSxiNtkMyX4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:10:10 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [BUG] perf: perf_output_sample() merge issue?

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 14:51 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> I think the intent of this commit was to add the watermark check
>> at the very end of the perf_output_sample() and NOT between processing
>> of RAW and BRANCH_STACK. Something may have gone wrong
>> in the merge.
>>
>> Can you confirm this?
>
> Yes very much so, good spotting. Weird stuff this merging.

Ok, so I will post a patch to fix that then.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/