[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120613133855.GA32428@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:38:56 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] irq/core changes for v3.5
* Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> A 5th option would be to emit a warning in case the flag is
> not set, fix it up for now and schedule it for removal in 3.6.
> Anything what's not fixed by then is broken for good.
Seems like the least invasive option to me. It's not like we are
in a rush to break more stuff.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists