[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120613230013.3cc59bf908616e94bb4ccef2@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:00:13 +0900
From: Takuya Yoshikawa <takuya.yoshikawa@...il.com>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhutchings@...arflare.com,
grundler@...isc-linux.org, arnd@...db.de, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
avi@...hat.com, mtosatti@...hat.com,
linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip: Use standard
__set_bit_le() function
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 22:31:13 +0900
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com> wrote:
> >> Should this hash_table be converted from u16 hash_table[32] to
> >> DECLARE_BITMAP(hash_table, 16 * 32) to ensure that it is aligned
> >> on long-word boundary?
> >
> > I think hash_table is already long-word aligned because it is placed
> > right after a pointer.
>
> I recommend converting to proper bitmap. Because such an implicit
> assumption is easily broken by someone touching this function.
Do you mean something like:
DECLARE_BITMAP(__hash_table, 16 * 32);
u16 *hash_table = (u16 *)__hash_table;
?
Grant, what do you think about this?
Takuya
===
drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/tulip_core.c:
static void build_setup_frame_hash(u16 *setup_frm, struct net_device *dev)
{
struct tulip_private *tp = netdev_priv(dev);
u16 hash_table[32];
...
}
drivers/net/ethernet/dec/tulip/de2104x.c:
static void build_setup_frame_hash(u16 *setup_frm, struct net_device *dev)
{
struct de_private *de = netdev_priv(dev);
u16 hash_table[32];
...
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists