linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] at91: platform data for atmel-mci (for 3.5)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FD8C476.3080904@atmel.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2012 18:48:54 +0200
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	"Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: platform data for atmel-mci (for 3.5)

On 06/04/2012 05:48 PM, Nicolas Ferre :
> On 05/31/2012 11:04 PM, Olof Johansson :
>> Hi Nicolas,
>>
>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:50 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com
>> <mailto:nicolas.ferre@...el.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 05/24/2012 05:12 PM, Nicolas Ferre :
>>     > Hi Arnd, hi Olof,
>>
>>     Ping?
>>
>>     (or maybe you will have a look at this after the merge window...)
>>
>>
>> So, I looked at this branch yesterday but I wasn't entirely happy with
>> the number of ifdefs it adds.
> 
> Unfortunately, this is the usual shape of any devices/boards files on
> AT91. This amount will be reduced when we remove the old driver and when
> we move newer/popular devices to Device Tree...
> 
>> If the idea is to deprecate the old driver, wouldn't it make more sense
>> to just cut everyone over instead of having both sets of setup in the
>> kernel?
> 
> Well, the old driver has existed since a very long time and I think that
> people are used to it on oldest platforms. This is why we put in place a
> overlapping period. This way we hope that the transition will be smoother.
> On the other hand, the old code will be removed in 3.7 so the
> overlapping period will not be so long.
> I hope that it will allow people to track bugs if some are remaining and
> switch to newer driver easily.

Olof, Arnd,

So, do you have made up your mind about this pull request?

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/