[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120613185106.GE13878@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 20:51:06 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/6] uprobes: don't use loff_t for the valid virtual address
loff_t looks confusing when it is used for the virtual address.
Change map_info and install_breakpoint/remove_breakpoint paths
to use "unsigned long".
The patch doesn't change vma_address(), it can't return "long"
because it is used to verify the mapping. But probably this
needs some cleanups too.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index a4dc9fa..773bb37 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -663,9 +663,8 @@ static int copy_insn(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct file *filp)
*/
static int
install_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
- struct vm_area_struct *vma, loff_t vaddr)
+ struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long vaddr)
{
- unsigned long addr;
int ret;
/*
@@ -678,8 +677,6 @@ install_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
if (!uprobe->consumers)
return -EEXIST;
- addr = (unsigned long)vaddr;
-
if (!(uprobe->flags & UPROBE_COPY_INSN)) {
ret = copy_insn(uprobe, vma->vm_file);
if (ret)
@@ -708,7 +705,7 @@ install_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
* Hence increment before and decrement on failure.
*/
atomic_inc(&mm->uprobes_state.count);
- ret = set_swbp(&uprobe->arch, mm, addr);
+ ret = set_swbp(&uprobe->arch, mm, vaddr);
if (ret)
atomic_dec(&mm->uprobes_state.count);
@@ -716,9 +713,9 @@ install_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm,
}
static void
-remove_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, loff_t vaddr)
+remove_breakpoint(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr)
{
- if (!set_orig_insn(&uprobe->arch, mm, (unsigned long)vaddr, true))
+ if (!set_orig_insn(&uprobe->arch, mm, vaddr, true))
atomic_dec(&mm->uprobes_state.count);
}
@@ -742,7 +739,7 @@ static void delete_uprobe(struct uprobe *uprobe)
struct map_info {
struct map_info *next;
struct mm_struct *mm;
- loff_t vaddr;
+ unsigned long vaddr;
};
static inline struct map_info *free_map_info(struct map_info *info)
@@ -836,7 +833,6 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
while (info) {
struct mm_struct *mm = info->mm;
struct vm_area_struct *vma;
- loff_t vaddr;
if (err)
goto free;
@@ -846,9 +842,8 @@ static int register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, bool is_register)
if (!vma || !valid_vma(vma, is_register))
goto unlock;
- vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
if (vma->vm_file->f_mapping->host != uprobe->inode ||
- vaddr != info->vaddr)
+ vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset) != info->vaddr)
goto unlock;
if (is_register) {
@@ -1054,10 +1049,8 @@ int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
count = 0;
list_for_each_entry(uprobe, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
- loff_t vaddr;
-
if (!ret) {
- vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
+ loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
if (vaddr < vma->vm_start || vaddr >= vma->vm_end) {
put_uprobe(uprobe);
@@ -1121,9 +1114,8 @@ void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned lon
build_probe_list(inode, &tmp_list);
list_for_each_entry(uprobe, &tmp_list, pending_list) {
- loff_t vaddr;
+ loff_t vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
- vaddr = vma_address(vma, uprobe->offset);
if (vaddr >= start && vaddr < end) {
/*
* An unregister could have removed the probe before
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists