[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1339623321.8980.66.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:35:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86: Track minimum microcode revision globally v2
On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 13:20 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
> index 8a2ce8f..b589c7a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c
> @@ -215,6 +215,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
> pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, rev);
> uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
> c->microcode = rev;
> + update_min_microcode(c);
>
> return 0;
> }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
> index 899057b..63e8a71 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c
> @@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ static int apply_microcode(int cpu)
> uci->cpu_sig.rev = val[1];
> c->microcode = val[1];
>
> + update_min_microcode(c);
> return 0;
> }
This would really much better live in common code where it can be
preemptible in some sites. There really is no need for this to be
non-preemptible.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists