linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mmc: block: Add write packing control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFR8ueecGqw=JzAGVHV61-SqOnn_C-ryT54KCQCbKkJpXUGY9w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:21:49 -0700
From:	Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@...il.com>
To:	merez@...eaurora.org
Cc:	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	DOCUMENTATION <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mmc: block: Add write packing control

On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:52 PM,  <merez@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, June 11, 2012 5:28 pm, Muthu Kumar wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Muthu Kumar <muthu.lkml@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Maya Erez <merez@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>> trigger
>>>> the packing can be configured via sysfs by writing the required value
>>>> to:
>>>> /sys/block/<block_dev_name>/num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing.
>>>> The trigger for disabling the write packing is fetching a read request.
>>>>
>>>
>>> If it is applicable only to MMC why do we have this sysfs attr for all
>>> block devices?
>>
>> Just to be clear, please create a directory, say mmc, under
>> /sys/block/<dev>/ and create the attr inside that.
>>
>> You can refer to dm (dm-sysfs.c) for sample implementation.
> I understand why you think it would be best to distinguish the MMC
> specific attribute from the general block devices attributes.
> However, since this attribute is created only for the MMC block device,
> other block devices won't be aware of it.

I understand its created by the MMC code so will not be there for
other block devices. But having the device specific attributes inside
one <device> directory is better/cleaner. And since we are already
following that model for other devices, why not follow that for MMC
also?

> Therefore, it doesn't
> necessarily require a separation to a different folder.
> Currently there is another MMC specific attribute (force_ro) which is also
> created in the root directory. I think it would be better to also create
> the num_wr_reqs_to_start_packing in the same folder as force_ro and not
> make it an exceptional attribute in its location and the code that handles
> it.

Then time to move that as well to "mmc" directory.

Regards,
Muthu


> I would appreciate your opinion on that.
>
> Thanks,
> Maya
> --
> Sent by consultant of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/