[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1339558508.7472.26.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 05:35:08 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: rcu: endless stalls
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 20:10 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 11:01 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > 2aa15890 - mm: prevent concurrent unmap_mapping_range() on the same inode
> >
> > I confess, you lost me on this one. You believe that this commit is
> > the cause of the RCU CPU stall warnings?
>
> 4096 tasks on 4096 CPUs exit (well, try to) simultaneously.
>
> Call Trace:
> __mutex_lock_slowpath+0x94/0x150
> mutex_lock+0x1a/0x40
> unlink_file_vma+0x3f/0xf0
> free_pgtables+0x40/0x100
> exit_mmap+0xb0/0x120
> mmput+0x49/0x120
> exit_mm+0x122/0x160
> do_exit+0x179/0x8d0
> do_group_exit+0x3d/0xb0
> sys_exit_group+0x12/0x20
>
> Monster box dies screaming.
That commit landed in stable, box with way too many cores (NR_CPUS=0!!)
chokes instantly with loads of spinners. Ok, so zillion CPUs grabbing a
mutex in lockstep is a bad idea (_having_ zillion?), but is there pilot
error involved in a logjam like this?
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists