linux-kernel - Re: AMD FX CPU bug, not fixed by latest microcode?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FD96742.9090700@pr.hu>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 06:23:30 +0200
From:	Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@...hu>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Johannes Stezenbach <js@...21.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@....com>
Subject: Re: AMD FX CPU bug, not fixed by latest microcode?

2012-06-14 00:06 keltezéssel, Borislav Petkov írta:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:26:07PM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> I did exactly that, the remaining two 8GB modules don't have faults
>> according to memtest86+ and the machine is stable with "make -j8" in
>> the kernel tree. Neither thunderbird nor firefox crashed for a day,
>> these are the usual victims when hitting the bad memory address.
> Cool.
>
> I guess you could try to limit it even further by taking a known-good
> 8GB module and pairing it with one of the "bad" ones to see whether one
> of the "bad" 8GB modules is faulty or both of them are.
>
> Or you could stop wasting time and go buy two new ones :-)

Yesterday I took the bad pair back to the shop with a screenshot
showing memtest86+ results and they accepted it for warranty.
I will get a new pair or RAMs for no extra fee.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/