linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 0/13] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABPqkBTPah786S+GR=TdGCTxGzBEVg-Q2r0YAUFrYAm5iVEf=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:41:25 +0200
From:	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To:	"Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@...el.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, mingo@...e.hu,
	jolsa@...hat.com, andi@...stfloor.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 0/13] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@...el.com> wrote:
> On 06/13/2012 05:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 09:41 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>> Peter suggests keeping the uncore names as they're listed in the intel
>>> doc. For Sandybirdge-EP, uncore names are something like: Cbo, iMC,
>>> QPI.
>>
>> No they're not, they're C-Box etc.. but I'm fine with doing a tolower on
>> all of it.
>>
>
> The reason I choose CBox instead of C-Box is that '-' is a separate symbol
> in the flex rules. '-' is used for matching events such as LLC-load-misses.
> I don't know how to allow letter '-' in the pmu name, but without leading
> to ambiguity.
>
I would drop the -, just call it cbox.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/