[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120614071637.GB27397@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 09:16:37 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
dhillf@...il.com, rientjes@...gle.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V9 04/15] hugetlb: use mmu_gather instead of a temporary
linked list for accumulating pages
On Wed 13-06-12 22:07:06, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> writes:
>
> > On Wed 13-06-12 15:57:23, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> Use a mmu_gather instead of a temporary linked list for accumulating
> >> pages when we unmap a hugepage range
> >
> > Sorry for coming up with the comment that late but you owe us an
> > explanation _why_ you are doing this.
> >
> > I assume that this fixes a real problem when we take i_mmap_mutex
> > already up in
> > unmap_mapping_range
> > mutex_lock(&mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
> > unmap_mapping_range_tree | unmap_mapping_range_list
> > unmap_mapping_range_vma
> > zap_page_range_single
> > unmap_single_vma
> > unmap_hugepage_range
> > mutex_lock(&vma->vm_file->f_mapping->i_mmap_mutex);
> >
> > And that this should have been marked for stable as well (I haven't
> > checked when this has been introduced).
>
> Switch to mmu_gather is to get rid of the use of page->lru so that i can use it for
> active list.
So can we get this to the changelog please?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists