lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FD99DD3.6060904@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:16:19 +0200
From:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC:	lenb@...nel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure

On 06/14/2012 09:49 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri,  8 Jun 2012 18:02:42 +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> We have the state index passed as parameter to the 'enter' function.
>> Most of the drivers assign their 'enter' functions several times in
>> the cpuidle_state structure, as we have the index, we can delegate
>> to the driver to handle their own callback array.
>>
>> That will have the benefit of removing multiple lines of code in the
>> different drivers.
>>
>> In order to smoothly modify the driver, the 'enter' function are in
>> the driver structure and in the cpuidle state structure. That will
>> let the time to modify the different drivers one by one.
>> So the 'cpuidle_enter' function checks if the 'enter' callback is
>> assigned in the driver structure and use it, otherwise it invokes
>> the 'enter' assigned to the cpuidle_state.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c |    4 +++-
>>  include/linux/cpuidle.h   |    1 +
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> index d90519c..155dee7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> @@ -46,7 +46,9 @@ static inline int cpuidle_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>>  				struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
>>  {
>>  	struct cpuidle_state *target_state = &drv->states[index];
>> -	return target_state->enter(dev, drv, index);
>> +
>> +	return drv->enter(dev, drv, index) ? drv->enter(dev, drv, index) :
> 
> Do you mean:
> 	       drv->enter ? drv->enter(dev, drv, index) :
> ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Namhyung

Right :)

-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ