[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FD9A27A.4040300@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:06:10 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 1/5] kthread: Implement park/unpark facility
On 06/13/2012 04:30 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> To avoid the full teardown/setup of per cpu kthreads in the case of
> cpu hot(un)plug, provide a facility which allows to put the kthread
> into a park position and unpark it when the cpu comes online again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> ---
>
> /**
> + * kthread_should_park - should this kthread return now?
> + *
> + * When someone calls kthread_park() on your kthread, it will be woken
> + * and this will return true. You should then return, and your return
> + * value will be passed through to kthread_park().
> + *
> + * Similar to kthread_should_stop(), but this keeps the thread alive
> + * and in a park position. kthread_unpark() "restart" the thread and
s/restart/restarts
> + * calls the thread function again.
> + */
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists