[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120614084300.GC9089@in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:13:00 +0530
From: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] uprobes: don't use loff_t for the valid virtual
address
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:38:26AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 08:51:06PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > loff_t looks confusing when it is used for the virtual address.
> > > Change map_info and install_breakpoint/remove_breakpoint paths
> > > to use "unsigned long".
> > >
> > > The patch doesn't change vma_address(), it can't return "long"
> > > because it is used to verify the mapping. But probably this
> > > needs some cleanups too.
> >
> > Oleg,
> >
> > As you mentioned in another email, this conflicts with my
> > [1/2] preparatory patch for the powerpc port. [...]
>
> Note, I already merged your preparatory patch into tip:perf/core
> a couple of days ago:
>
> 7eb9ba5ed312 uprobes: Pass probed vaddr to arch_uprobe_analyze_insn()
>
> So as long as Oleg is working on top of -tip there should be no
> conflict.
Ah.. thanks Ingo. I missed that tip commit email.
Ananth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists