linux-kernel - Re: [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Basic cputime accounting for adaptive tickless

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1339665015.2559.16.camel@twins>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:10:15 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
	Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
	Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"Luck,Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Basic cputime accounting for adaptive
 tickless

On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 11:07 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 18:19 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Ingo, Thomas,
> > 
> > This starts the basic code that allow accounting of cputime spent tickless
> > outside idle, which is a first step to prepare for the adaptive nohz
> > infrastructure.
> > 
> > I hope we can set a tree in -tip for that. If you're fine with it
> > this is pullable from:
> 
> There's a number of architecture that already does fine grained
> user/kernel time accounting on syscall boundaries etc.. s390, powerpc
> and ia64.
> 
> You're now adding a 3rd way of accounting user/kernel time.. I'm not
> much looking fwd to that..

Note there's also the whole IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING muck.. all in all its
getting quite ridiculous.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/