[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120614105130.GB8683@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:51:31 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shai@...lemp.com,
kiran.thirumalai@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <wfg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/platform] x86/vsmp: Ignore IOAPIC IRQ affinity if
possible
* Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:58:43AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ido Yariv <ido@...ery.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This seems to break when CONFIG_PARAVIRT is set but CONFIG_SMP
> > > isn't. Since there's little point in optimizing IOAPIC routing
> > > for UP kernels, how about the following fix?
> >
> > Looks good to me, I'll give it some testing.
>
> I'm afraid this patch is missing one more config dependency. Since
> no_irq_affinity is declared in proc.c, we need to verify that
> CONFIG_PROC_FS is set before referencing this variable. The below patch
> fixes this.
>
> Thanks to Fengguang Wu for reporting this.
Please send a delta fix patch on top of latest -tip to fix this.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists