[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120614114712.GR13602@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:47:14 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, ben-linux@...ff.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
w.sang@...gutronix.de, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] i2c: omap: ack IRQ in parts
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 12:20:17PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 01:20:42PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > According to flow diagrams on OMAP TRMs,
> > we should ACK the IRQ as they happen.
>
> You don't explain that you're adding a new dev_err() statement into the
> driver for a missing acknowledge.
>
> What if you're probing for a device - can this cause spam to the kernel
> console? What if you have protocol mangling enabled with the "ignore
> lack of ack bit set" ?
indeed... maybe dev_vdbg() would fit better, or just don't add anything.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists