[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1206141707420.3086@ionos>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:08:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 2/5] smpboot: Provide infrastructure for percpu
hotplug threads
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 04:12:14PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > > Btw, if that simpler yield approach is working and I can't see why it
> > > > shouldn't then you can get rid of the node task as well. The only
> > > > purpose of it is to push up the priority of yielding tasks, right?
> > >
> > > Ah, missed that it calls rcu_initiate_boost() as well....
> >
> > And looking further, I really don't understand why it's doing
> > that. That node thread is only woken by these weird yield timers.
>
> If your patch works out, it indeed might be possible to get rid of
> ->node_kthread_task. The ->boost_kthread_task needs to stay, however.
That's right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists