linux-kernel - Re: [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Basic cputime accounting for adaptive tickless

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:34:57 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
	Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
	Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
	Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	"Luck,Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC GIT PULL] nohz: Basic cputime accounting for adaptive
 tickless

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 04:36:33PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > > > > > > I'll try something with that.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Maybe sanitize all the variants under a single set of 
> > > > > > wrappers/callbacks?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, please!
> > > > 
> > > > Sure, I'm working in it.
> > >  
> > > Please keep me in the loop, I want to avoid that things 
> > > break on s390. Thanks.
> > 
> > Well, I realize I can't consolidate much between ia64, s390 
> > and ppc because they all handle virtual cpu time accounting 
> > very differently. I'm also not what the virtual timer is for.
> 
> As a first step I'd suggest to create a superset of all existing 
> and relied-upon wrappers/callbacks, into a single obvious 
> sched_*() or time_*() namespace, without breaking functionality.

But the API is already well defined. The arch just need to implement
account_system_vtime() and account_process_tick() and record the time
on the kernel boundaries. This is pretty well contained in ppc entry.S where
it is implemented through ACCOUNT_CPU_USER_ENTRY/EXIT macros (although
I see the time accounted on syscall boundaries but not in exceptions),
it's more complicated in ia64 as the virt accounting is spread here and there
in entry.S and it's always on in s390.

May be we could standardize a bit the way we save and account the time.
This require some non-trivial asm surgery on archs I don't know much about
though.

> 
> Once that is done we can eliminate individual, conceptually 
> redundant callbacks, by carefully morphing the affected arches 
> step by step.
> 
> No arch will be left behind.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/