linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/xen: avoid updating TLS descriptors if they haven't changed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:05:33 +0100
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC:	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/xen: avoid updating TLS descriptors if they haven't
 changed

On 14/06/12 17:49, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 03:52:19PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 07/06/12 18:01, David Vrabel wrote:
>>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
>>>
>>> When switching tasks in a Xen PV guest, avoid updating the TLS
>>> descriptors if they haven't changed.  This improves the speed of
>>> context switches by almost 10% as much of the time the descriptors are
>>> the same or only one is different.
>>>
>>> The descriptors written into the GDT by Xen are modified from the
>>> values passed in the update_descriptor hypercall so we keep shadow
>>> copies of the three TLS descriptors to compare against.
>>>
>>> lmbench3 test     Before  After  Improvement
>>> --------------------------------------------
>>> lat_ctx -s 32 24   7.19    6.52  9%
>>> lat_pipe          12.56   11.66  7%
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
>>> ---
>>> I note that the comment in asm/desc_defs.h says the 'a' and 'b' fields
>>> in desc_struct as deprecated but there seems to be no suitable
>>> alternatives.
>>
>> ping?  Any opinion on this patch from the x86 side?  If it's okay can we
>> get an ack so Konrad can take the patch via his tree.
> 
> It breaks my all my bootup tests - so NACK until at least that is fixed.
> I think I sent you the whole serial log - is there something else that would help
> narrow it down?

You're mixing up this patch with "xen/mm: do direct hypercall in
xen_set_pte() if batching is unavailable" which is broken on 64-bit and
I am looking into it.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/