[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120614022132.GA3766@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 11:21:32 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add gfp_mask parameter to vm_map_ram()
Hello, guys.
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:07:53AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> It shouldn't work because vmap_page_range still can allocate
> GFP_KERNEL by pud_alloc in vmap_pud_range. For it, I tried [1] but
> other mm guys want to add WARNING [2] so let's avoiding gfp context
> passing.
>
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/4/23/77
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/5/2/340
Yeah, vmalloc area doesn't support !GFP_KERNEL allocations and as
Minchan said, changing this would require updating page table
allocation functions on all archs. This is the same reason why percpu
allocator doesn't support !GFP_KERNEL allocations which in turn made
blk-throttle implement its own private percpu pool.
If xfs can't live without GFP_NOFS vmalloc allocations, either it has
to implement its own pool or maybe it's time to implement !GFP_KERNEL
allocs for vmalloc area. I don't know.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists