linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] x86, fpu: unify signal handling code paths for x86 and x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:49:56 -0700
From:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hans Rosenfeld <hans.rosenfeld@....com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [RFC] x86, fpu: unify signal handling code paths for x86 and
 x86_64 kernels

On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 13:48 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/12/2012 05:03 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > I can split the patch if needed. And I need to do little bit more
> > validation (already tested on 64-bit IVB  and 32-bit NHM) before
> > removing the 'RFC' tag.
> > 
> > I tried starting with the old version of Hans patch. But there were lot
> > more changes in this area since then and also his patch had few
> > user-visible compatibility issues.
> > 
> > Appended is the version that I came up with. Please review.
> > 
> 
> This patch doesn't apply to v3.5-rc2.
> 

Patch I sent was against -tip tree.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/