[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FDA5413.9080400@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 14:13:55 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
sjhill@...s.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: bugs in page colouring code
On 06/14/2012 02:03 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On 06/14/2012 04:58 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 06/14/2012 05:57 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>>
>>> However, I expect that on x86 many applications expect
>>> MAP_FIXED to just work, and enforcing that would be
>>> more trouble than it's worth.
>>>
>>
>> MAP_FIXED, is well, fixed. It means that performance be screwed, if we
>> can fulfill the request we MUST do so.
>
> My codebase now has a separate arch_align_addr function
> for x86, which is surprisingly similar to the generic
> one :)
I am much more skeptical to disabling page coloring in the !PF_RANDOMIZE
case when no address hint is proposed. I would like to at least try
running without it, perhaps with a chicken bit in a sysctl.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists