linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix the outmost stupidity of tracing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1339717703.13377.285.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 19:48:23 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix the outmost stupidity of tracing_off()

On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 01:12 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:

> That's still not an excuse for utter stupidity, really. Just check the
> commit date vs. your discovery time.
> 
> I told you often enough to be more careful, but that one is really
> beyond comprehension.

I'm really thinking that this was due to a bad push. As I believe I had
stale code (made this fix locally, but pushed the broken branch) and all
my changes were on top of it. When updating to the latest tip, I had
code I didn't want to merge, or conflicts happened, that I ended up
cherry-picking changes. Which breaks from my normal workflow, which is
to make sure my old changes fast forward to tip before doing a rebase of
my new code.

I have several branches that I work on and when they are ready, I rebase
them on top of tip, run a bunch of tests, and then push them out.

I'm a heavy user of tracing_off() too, and since the development of my
work is usually on older branches, I would not have noticed the bug. As
after I get things working I usually rebase on top of tip before doing
my final tests and asking for the pull request.

I'm usually very careful about checking that things fast forward and
such, and that rebases don't have strange conflicts. This one slipped
by, and yes, I'm extremely ashamed and embarrassed by it. That's why I
said in my pull request 'This was one of those "oh crap" moments'.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/