linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 14 Jun 2012 12:06:07 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure in Linus' tree

On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:47:22AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Linus,
> 
> While building Linus' tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> In file included from include/asm-generic/bug.h:5:0,
>                  from arch/powerpc/include/asm/bug.h:127,
>                  from arch/powerpc/kernel/head_64.S:31:
> include/linux/kernel.h:44:0: warning: "ALIGN" redefined [enabled by default]
> include/linux/linkage.h:57:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> include/linux/sysinfo.h: Assembler messages:
> include/linux/sysinfo.h:7: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `struct'
> include/linux/sysinfo.h:8: Error: Unrecognized opcode: `__kernel_long_t'
> 
> And it went downhill from there :-(
> 
> Caused by commit 3777808873b0 ("bug.h: need linux/kernel.h for
> TAINT_WARN") which, unfortunately never made it into linux-next.
> 
> I have reverted that commit for today (which presumably means that sh
> builds will be broken again).

I'm still unsure as to the best way to fix this, and there was no
response to the original mail I posted about it either:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133879579014853&w=2

I'll fetch a powerpc cross compiler and see if I can figure out what went
wrong.

We can always bite the bullet and stuff it in the sh thread_info.h, but
that's papering around the issue, and any other TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK &&
!HAVE_SET_RESTORE_SIGMASK generic bug user will have to use the same
hack.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/