[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBT4GPTp3k6Ko-t4Q5Kgz54O5yBZ7L+9M6Uc660rxTtrAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:32:20 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, acme@...hat.com,
mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org, cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] perf, x86: Making hardware events tranlations sysfs available
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:36:51PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:09 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 22:38 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> >> Making hardware events tranlations available throught the sysfs.
>> >> Adding 'events' group attribute under the sysfs x86 PMU record
>> >> with attribute/file for each hardware event:
>> >>
>> >> # ls /sys/devices/cpu/events/
>> >> branch_instructions
>> >> branch_misses
>> >> bus_cycles
>> >> cache_misses
>> >> cache_references
>> >> cycles
>> >> instructions
>> >> ref_cycles
>> >> stalled_cycles_backend
>> >> stalled_cycles_frontend
>> >>
>> >> The file - ID mappings is:
>> >>
>> >> file hw id
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> cycles PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES
>> >> instructions PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS
>> >> cache_references PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_REFERENCES
>> >> cache_misses PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MISSES
>> >> branch_instructions PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_INSTRUCTIONS
>> >> branch_misses PERF_COUNT_HW_BRANCH_MISSES
>> >> bus_cycles PERF_COUNT_HW_BUS_CYCLES
>> >> stalled_cycles_frontend PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_FRONTEND
>> >> stalled_cycles_backend PERF_COUNT_HW_STALLED_CYCLES_BACKEND
>> >> ref_cycles PERF_COUNT_HW_REF_CPU_CYCLES
>> >>
>> >> Each attribute/file contains HW ID event translation for the currently
>> >> running CPU model
>> >>
>> >> # cat /sys/devices/cpu/events/instructions
>> >> 0xc0
>> >
>> > Why not have it consistent with the stuff done for uncore where events
>> > read: 'event=0xc0', ie the regular field=value stuff.
>> >
>> Yes, you want that. Because those events may need more than a code.
>> You want full syntax capability. So return a string.
>
> humm... right :)
>
> how about the term name 'event=...', could I always assume it's 'event',
> or do we want some arch specific connection for that?
>
You should not assume anything. You grab the string from sysfs and put it
through your regular parser. It could have arch specific terms in it. That's
how I suspect this is done for uncore.
> jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists