[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FDB050F.7040503@parallels.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:49:03 +0400
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: <mingo@...nel.org>, <pjt@...gle.com>, <venki@...gle.com>,
<efault@....de>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] sched: Push put_prev_task() into pick_next_task()
On 06/14/2012 05:29 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> +static struct task_struct *
> +pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
> {
> - struct task_struct *p = _pick_next_task_rt(rq);
> + struct task_struct *p;
> + struct rt_rq *rt_rq =&rq->rt;
> +
> + if (!rt_rq->rt_nr_running)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (rt_rq_throttled(rt_rq))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (prev)
> + prev->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, prev);
> +
it might be me, but this one sounds strange. If the responsibility of
putting the task now lays with pic_next_task, you can't return NULL
without doing this first.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists