[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUq39+VQMU6rq78iqpy2m-PnSwWUW4M3WYjpecVVv4jhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:11:12 +0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@...cle.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression"
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Takashi, could you help to test if the S4 regression is still
> there after this patch?
Hello,
Any comments?
I have tested this revert on my laptop, with running simple
"suspend and resume" test for several times, I didn't see any
problem.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists