linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core.c Pass voltage to notifier when setting voltage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120615180812.GA18638@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:08:12 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Pankaj Jangra <jangra.pankaj9@...il.com>
Cc:	Philip Rakity <philipspatches@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	Philip Rakity <prakity@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: core.c Pass voltage to notifier when
 setting voltage

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:28:38PM +0530, Pankaj Jangra wrote:

> I am also curious to know if you pass the  voltage here to notifier call
> how does it make any difference, since in
> blocking_notifier_call_chain() again passes the NULL. So does your patch
> should  modify the arguments to this function also?
> Please let me know if i am missing something in understanding.

Your mail would have been rather more comprehensible if you'd mentioned
that you were talking about the call in _blocking_notifier_call_chain()
(which is obviously buggy).

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)