[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1339794370-28119-15-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 14:06:10 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, patches@...aro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/15] rcu: RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK code no longer ever dead
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Before RCU had unified idle, the RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK leg of the switch
statement in force_quiescent_state() was dead code for CONFIG_NO_HZ=n
kernel builds. With unified idle, the code is never dead. This commit
therefore removes the "if" statement designed to make gcc aware of when
the code was and was not dead.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 75ad92a..0b0c9cc 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1744,8 +1744,6 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, int relaxed)
break; /* grace period idle or initializing, ignore. */
case RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK:
- if (RCU_SIGNAL_INIT != RCU_SAVE_DYNTICK)
- break; /* So gcc recognizes the dead code. */
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled */
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists